A UX Collective piece uses Bruce Lee's 'be water' philosophy to argue that rigid design processes are failing teams working with AI tools.
The article's real value is in its challenge to fixed-stage design frameworks: the author contends that AI experimentation demands adaptive, intention-driven workflows over linear ones, and walks through what that structural shift actually looks like in practice.
If you work in product design and are still forcing AI tooling into a waterfall or double-diamond structure, this piece makes the case for why that friction is not a tooling problem. Read it for the process critique, not the Bruce Lee framing.
[READ ORIGINAL →]