ArXiv will ban authors for one year if they submit papers where AI generated all the scientific content. The preprint server, which hosts over 2 million papers across physics, math, and computer science, is drawing a hard line: AI can assist, but humans must own the intellectual work. Lazy delegation to LLMs is now a bannable offense, not just a policy footnote.
The distinction ArXiv is enforcing matters more than the punishment itself. Editing, polishing, or formatting with AI remains permitted. Using an LLM to generate the actual findings, arguments, or conclusions does not. This is the first major scientific repository to attach a concrete, time-based penalty to AI misuse rather than issuing vague warnings about responsible use.
Read the original TechCrunch piece for the specific mechanisms ArXiv is using to detect full-AI submissions and how they plan to handle appeals. The enforcement question is where this policy either has teeth or falls apart entirely.
[READ ORIGINAL →]